Linear relationships in sunflower genotypes in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Follmann, Diego Nicolau; Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto; Pereira, Anderson Crestani; Loro, Murilo Vieira; Santos, Emilso Damm dos; Rosa, Guilherme Bergeijer da

doi:10.1590/0103-8478cr20230201

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil
SciELO.org - Rede SciELO
Blog SciELO em Perspectiva

Abrir menu

Brasil

Español English

Ciência Rural

Submissão de manuscritos
Sobre o periódico
Corpo Editorial
Instruções aos autores
Contato

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Resumo (Inglês)
Resumo (Português)

Texto (Inglês)

Download PDF (Inglês)

Compartilhe

Compartilhe
E-mail
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Reddit
StambleUpon
CiteULike
Mendeley

Sumário

Compartilhe
E-mail
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Reddit
StambleUpon
CiteULike
Mendeley

Resumo (Inglês)
Resumo (Português)

Texto (Inglês)

Download PDF (Inglês)

CROP PRODUCTION • Cienc. Rural 54 (9) • 2024 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20230201 copy

Linear relationships in sunflower genotypes in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Relações lineares em genótipos de girassol no estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT:

The state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS) is the third largest sunflower producer in Brazil. This study verified the existence of linear relationships between grain yield, oil content, and oil yield in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes evaluated in RS. The data on grain yield (GY), oil content (OC), and oil yield (OY) were obtained from 73 sunflower cultivar trials in 21 municipalities in RS from 1999 to 2018. Scatter diagrams were createdto investigate the relationships between the variables GY, OC, and OY. Then, Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient (r) was calculated between the variables, and the Student’s t-test was performed at a 5% significance level. There is a positive and significant linear relationship between PG and OY. However, no linear relationship was found between grain yield and oil content in sunflower genotypes. Additionally, a positive linear association of high magnitude (r = 0.9672) was observed between grain yield and oil yield, while a low magnitude (r = 0.2245) was found between oil content and oil yield.

Key words:
Helianthus annuus L.; grain yield; oil content; oil yield; correlation.

Authorship

Diego Nicolau Follmann ^*E-mail: diegonicolaufollmann@gmail.com. *Corresponding author.

Departamento de Fitotecnia, Centro de Ciências Rurais (CCR), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)BrasilSanta Maria, RS, BrasilDepartamento de Fitotecnia, Centro de Ciências Rurais (CCR), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7351-7022

Alberto Cargnelutti Filho

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8608-9960

Anderson Crestani Pereira

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4971-478X

Murilo Vieira Loro

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-4226

Emilso Damm dos Santos

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5856-3469

Guilherme Bergeijer da Rosa

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1121-6574

E-mail: diegonicolaufollmann@gmail.com. ^*Corresponding author.

SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Figures | Tables

Figures (2)
Tables (5)

Thumbnail

Figure 1
Geographic representation of 21 locations where the sunflower genotype testing network was conducted from 1999 to 2018in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Thumbnail

Figure 2
Matrix with frequency histogram (on the diagonal) and scatter diagrams (off the diagonal) between grain yield (GY), oil content (OC), and oil yield (OY) of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes evaluated from 1999 to 2018 in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Pearson’s linear correlation coefficients (r) between variables and Student’s t-test P-value.

Thumbnail

Table 1
Number of trials in each location and year and total trials per location and year conducted in the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotype testing network from 1999 to 2018 in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Number of genotypes evaluated each year.

Thumbnail

Table 2
List of documents published annually by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA) in partnership with public and private institutions, referring to the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotype testing network from 1999 to 2018 in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Thumbnail

Table 3
Number of observations, minimum, percentiles 1, 2.5, 25, 50 (median), 75, 97.5, and 99, maximum, range, mean, variance, standard deviation, standard error, coefficient of variation (CV), skewness, kurtosis, and P-value of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test of variables evaluated in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes from 1999 to 2018 in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Thumbnail

Table 4
Means of grain yield, oil content, and oil yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes per agricultural year evaluated from 1999 to 2018 in 21 locations in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Thumbnail

Table 5
Means of grain yield, oil content, and oil yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes per location evaluated from 1999 to 2018 in 21 locations in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Figure 1 Geographic representation of 21 locations where the sunflower genotype testing network was conducted from 1999 to 2018in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Figure 2 Matrix with frequency histogram (on the diagonal) and scatter diagrams (off the diagonal) between grain yield (GY), oil content (OC), and oil yield (OY) of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes evaluated from 1999 to 2018 in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Pearson’s linear correlation coefficients (r) between variables and Student’s t-test P-value.

Table 1 Number of trials in each location and year and total trials per location and year conducted in the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotype testing network from 1999 to 2018 in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Number of genotypes evaluated each year.

Location	1999/2000	2000/2001	2001/2002	2002/2003	2003/2004	2004/2005	2005/2006	2006/2007	2007/2008	2008/2009	2009/2010	2010/2011	2011/2012	2012/2013	2013/2014	2014/2015	2015/2016	2016/2017	2017/2018	2018/2019	Total
Bom Progresso	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	1
Caxias do Sul	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1
Coxilha	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-		1	1	-	-	3
Cruz Alta	-	-		1		1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3
Encruzilhada do Sul	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3
Hulha Negra	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1
Ibirubá	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2
Ijuí	-	1	1	-	-	1	2	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6
Palmeiras das Missões	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1
Passo Fundo	1	1	-	1	-	-	1	2	-	1	1	-	1	1	1	1	-	-	-	-	12
Pelotas	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1
Rio Pardo	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	4
Santa Cruz do Sul	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2
Santa Maria	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	3
Santa Rosa	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3
São Borja	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	1	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	4
São Gabriel	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2
Três de Maio	-	-	-	1	1	1	1	-	1	1	1	1	-	-	1	1	1	1	1	1	14
Uruguaiana	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1
Vacaria	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3
Veranópolis	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3
Total trials	1	2	1	3	2	4	5	10	2	6	8	5	8	3	2	2	2	3	2	2	73
Total genotypes in the year	24	24	19	22	13	10	26	40	42	34	31	28	25	23	28	17	18	17	15	14	281

Table 2 List of documents published annually by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA) in partnership with public and private institutions, referring to the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotype testing network from 1999 to 2018 in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Table 3 Number of observations, minimum, percentiles 1, 2.5, 25, 50 (median), 75, 97.5, and 99, maximum, range, mean, variance, standard deviation, standard error, coefficient of variation (CV), skewness, kurtosis, and P-value of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test of variables evaluated in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes from 1999 to 2018 in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Statistic	Grain yield (kg ha^-1)	Oil content (%)	Oil yield (kg ha^-1)
Number of observations	1137	1137	1137
Minimum	375.90	20.34	160.11
Percentile 1	726.63	34.10	288.53
Percentile 2.5	914.40	35.80	369.97
Percentile 25	1528.00	40.60	650.88
Median	1973.00	43.02	844.93
Percentile 75	2503.00	45.30	1073.14
Percentile 97.5	3514.98	49.44	1533.89
Percentile 99	3777.52	51.00	1652.92
Maximum	4484.00	53.42	1913.76
Range	4108.10	33.08	1753.65
Mean	2030.24	42.91	870.83
Variance	479204.55	12.90	92485.91
Standard deviation	692.25	3.59	304.11
Standard error	20.53	0.11	9.02
CV (%)	34.10	8.37	34.92
Skewness	0.39	-0.67	0.44
Kurtosis	-0.22	2.69	0.02
P-value	0.07	0.09	0.05

Table 4 Means of grain yield, oil content, and oil yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes per agricultural year evaluated from 1999 to 2018 in 21 locations in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Agricultural year	Grain yield (kg ha^-1)	Oil content (%)	Oil yield (kg ha^-1)
1999/2000	1978.08	43.06	854.48
2000/2001	1695.78	46.12	777.17
2001/2002	2304.42	37.46	852.89
2002/2003	1639.37	40.54	666.69
2003/2004	1450.02	42.52	623.18
2004/2005	1814.43	41.78	755.66
2005/2006	1647.59	43.63	716.21
2006/2007	2218.78	43.22	955.98
2007/2008	2097.91	41.25	872.38
2008/2009	1816.17	43.97	796.50
2009/2010	1755.38	43.71	766.36
2010/2011	2798.49	42.81	1205.13
2011/2012	2150.18	43.66	944.06
2012/2013	1820.19	41.56	757.75
2013/2014	2359.38	42.51	1004.14
2014/2015	2321.26	44.05	1023.50
2015/2016	2028.32	40.23	822.65
2016/2017	2207.28	42.26	931.14
2017/2018	2376.13	42.28	1003.76
2018/2019	2435.12	40.92	995.83
Mean	2030.24	42.91	870.83

Table 5 Means of grain yield, oil content, and oil yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes per location evaluated from 1999 to 2018 in 21 locations in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Location	Grain yield (kg ha^-1)	Oil content (%)	Oil yield (kg ha^-1)
Bom Progresso	2718.13	41.66	1133.89
Caxias do Sul	2859.25	44.15	1263.80
Coxilha	2624.17	43.48	1146.34
Cruz Alta	1714.46	43.16	729.16
Encruzilhada do Sul	1693.20	45.61	778.91
Hulha Negra	1393.08	40.15	559.23
Ibirubá	2122.48	42.80	905.42
Ijuí	1713.01	43.19	727.46
Palmeiras das Missões	3064.56	40.79	1257.22
Passo Fundo	1897.12	43.12	819.49
Pelotas	3178.56	46.40	1475.93
Rio Pardo	2746.32	42.47	1172.50
Santa Cruz do Sul	2376.71	41.83	996.72
Santa Maria	2263.93	41.79	945.14
Santa Rosa	2285.47	43.89	1002.62
São Borja	1351.56	43.76	592.19
São Gabriel	2535.43	42.95	1079.44
Três de Maio	1683.93	41.98	711.96
Uruguaiana	1824.81	43.90	805.94
Vacaria	2645.84	42.68	1122.71
Veranópolis	1953.46	42.48	828.66
Mean	2030.24	42.91	870.83

How to cite

copy

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciências Rurais , 97105-900 Santa Maria RS Brazil , Tel.: +55 55 3220-8698 , Fax: +55 55 3220-8695 - Santa Maria - RS - Brazil
E-mail: cienciarural@mail.ufsm.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

Versão para download de PDF

PDF

Inglês

Versões e tradução automática

Versão original do texto

English

Tradução automática

Google Translator
Microsoft Translator

Como citar

RIS

BIBTEX

Outros formatos de citação e exportação:

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online
Rua Dr. Diogo de Faria, 1087 – 9º andar – Vila Clementino 04037-003 São Paulo/SP - Brasil
E-mail: scielo@scielo.org

Leia a Declaração de Acesso Aberto

Métricas

Linear relationships in sunflower genotypes in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

PlumX

Mensagem

[1] E-mail: diegonicolaufollmann@gmail.com. ^*Corresponding author.

Agricultural year	Document	Authors	Home and end pages	Number of trials
1999/2000	Doc. 137 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 1998/1999 e 1999. 99p.	Oliveira & Leite (1999OLIVEIRA, M. F.; LEITE, R. M. V. B. C. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 1998/99 e 1999. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 1999. 99p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/461357 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	30-31	1
2000/2001	Doc. 174 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2000/2001 e 2001. 100p.	Oliveira et al. (2001OLIVEIRA, M. F. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2000/2001 e 2001. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2001. 97p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/462978 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	25-26; 44-45	2
2001/2002	Doc. 205 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2001/2002 e 2002. 88p.	Oliveira et al. (2003OLIVEIRA, M. F. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2001/2002 e 2002. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2003. 88p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/461717 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	32-33	1
2002/2003	Doc. 226 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2002/2003 e 2003. 97p.	Carvalho et al. (2003CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2002/2003 e 2003. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2003. 97p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/467127 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	23-24; 38-39; 40-41	3
2003/2004	Doc. 250 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2003/2004 e 2004. 91p.	Carvalho et al. (2004CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2003/2004 e 2004. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2004. 91p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/467383 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	21-22; 25-26	2
2004/2005	Doc. 271 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2004/2005 e 2005. 121p.	Carvalho et al. (2006CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2004/2005 e 2005. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2006. 118p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/469166 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	20-21; 22-23; 24-25; 26-27	4
2005/2006	Doc. 285 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2005/2006 e 2006. 120p.	Carvalho et al. (2007CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2005/2006 e 2006. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2007. 120p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/467839 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	20-21; 22-23; 24-25; 35-36; 37-38	5
2006/2007	Doc. 295 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2006/2007 e 2007. 108p.	Carvalho et al. (2008CARVALHO, C.G.P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2006/2007 e 2007. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2008. 108p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/470485 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	21-22; 23-24; 25-26; 36-37; 38-39; 40-41; 42-43; 44-45; 46-47; 48-49	10
2007/2008	Doc. 316 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2007/2008 e 2008. 106p.	Carvalho et al. (2009CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2008/2009 e 2009. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2009. 109p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/711901 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	21-22; 35-36	2
2008/2009	Doc. 320 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2008/2009 e 2009. 109p.	Carvalho et al. (2009CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2008/2009 e 2009. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2009. 109p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/711901 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	22-23; 24-25; 47-48; 49-50; 51-52; 53-55	6
2009/2010	Doc. 326 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2009/2010 e 2010. 107p.	Carvalho et al. (2011CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2010/2011 e 2011. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2011. 98p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/909776 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	21-22; 23-24; 25-26; 27-28; 42-43; 44-45; 46-47; 48-49	8
2010/2011	Doc. 329 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2010/2011 e 2011. 98p.	Carvalho et al. (2011CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2010/2011 e 2011. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2011. 98p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/909776 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	21-22; 23-24; 35-36; 37-38; 39-40	5
2011/2012	Doc. 340 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2011/2012 e 2012. 101p.	Carvalho et al. (2013CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2011/2012 e 2012. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2013. 101p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/980582 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	22-23; 24-25; 26-27; 28-29; 39-40; 41-42; 43-44; 45-46	8
2012/2013	Doc. 355 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2012/2013 e 2013. 105p.	Carvalho et al. (2014CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2012/2013 e 2013. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2014. 105p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/1001040 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	39-40; 41-42; 43-44	3
2013/2014	Doc. 360 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2013/2014 e 2014. 104p.	Carvalho et al. (2015CARVALHO, C. G. P. Adaptability and stability of sunflower genotypes imidazolinone resistant in second crop cultivation. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, v.10, n.1, p.1-7, 2015. Available from: <Available from: http://www.agraria.pro.br/ojs32/index.php/RBCA/article/view/v10i1a3804/593 >. Accessed: Feb. 23, 2023. doi: 10.5039/agraria.v10i1a3804. http://www.agraria.pro.br/ojs32/index.ph... )	24-25; 42-43	2
2014/2015	Doc. 367 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2014/2015 e 2015. 108p.	Carvalho et al. (2015CARVALHO, C. G. P. Adaptability and stability of sunflower genotypes imidazolinone resistant in second crop cultivation. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, v.10, n.1, p.1-7, 2015. Available from: <Available from: http://www.agraria.pro.br/ojs32/index.php/RBCA/article/view/v10i1a3804/593 >. Accessed: Feb. 23, 2023. doi: 10.5039/agraria.v10i1a3804. http://www.agraria.pro.br/ojs32/index.ph... )	24-25; 38-39	2
2015/2016	Doc. 381 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2015/2016 e 2016. 94p.	Carvalho et al. (2016CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2015/2016 e 2016. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2016. 94p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/1063023 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	24-25; 36-37	2
2016/2017	Doc. 396 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2016/2017 e 2017. 116p.	Carvalho et al. (2017CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2016/2017 e 2017. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2017. 116p. Available from: <Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/1084170 >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/in... )	24-25; 40-41; 42-43	3
2017/2018	Doc. 409 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2017/2018 e 2018. 82p.	Carvalho et al. (2018CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2017/2018 e 2018. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2018. 82p. Available from: <Available from: https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/191336/1/Doc-409-Informe-girassol-1.pdf >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/... )	20-21; 34-35	2
2018/2019	Doc. 421 - Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2018/2019 e 2019. 87p.	Carvalho et al. (2019CARVALHO, C. G. P. et al. Informes da avaliação de genótipos de girassol, 2018/2019 e 2019. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2019. 87p. Available from: <Available from: https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/211008/1/Doc-421.pdf >. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2023. https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/... )	19-20; 31-32	2