What Explains the Infrastructure Inequality of the EMEIs in Belo Horizonte?

Braga, Daniel Santos; Silva, Franceline Rodrigues; Nonato, Bréscia França

doi:10.1590/2175-6236124081vs02

Daniel Santos Braga E-mail: daniels.braga@hotmail.com

Daniel Santos Braga is a professor at the Postgraduate Program in Education and Human Training at the Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais(UEMG), campus Ibirité. He holds a PhD in Education from the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), where he is a professor in the Department of Sciences Applied to Education.

Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (UEMG), Belo Horizonte/MG – Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5075-4570

Franceline Rodrigues Silva E-mail: franceline.rodrigues30@gmail.com

Franceline Rodrigues Silva has a PhD in Education from the Faculdade de Educação at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). She holds a Master’s in Education from Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (UEMG) and a Creative Education specialist from Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC-MG). She has been a Childhood Education teacher in the Belo Horizonte Municipal Education System since 2014.

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte/MG – Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-3192

Bréscia França Nonato E-mail: nonatobrescia@gmail.com

Bréscia França Nonato is an Assistant Professor at Faculdade de Educação at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). She is a doctor and master in Education, graduated in Pedagogy, all in the same university. She is a member of Programa Observatório da Juventude and Grupo de Estudos sobre Educação Superior (GEES).

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte/MG – Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6779-8278

E-mail: daniels.braga@hotmail.com

E-mail: franceline.rodrigues30@gmail.com

E-mail: nonatobrescia@gmail.com

Editor in charge: Carla Karnoppi Vasques

Interest Items	Combination of primary variables	Attributed Value
(1) Water supply	Drinkable water from the public system supply	2
	Drinkable water from outside the public system supply (well, pit)	1
	Non-drinkable water	0
(2) Electric energy	Through public energy system	2
	Other sources to obtain energy (generator)	1
	No electric energy	0
(3) Basic sanitation	Through public system and periodic collection or recycling	2
	Other sources of garbage and sewage disposal	1
	No public system and periodic collection or recycling	0
(4) Food	Meals, kitchen, and cafeteria	2
	Meals together with kitchen or cafeteria	1
	Food with no kitchen and cafeteria	0
(5) Restrooms	Specific restrooms for adults, children, people with disabilities, and shower	2
	At least specific restrooms for adults and children	1
	No specific restroom for adults or for children	0
(6) Administrative facilities	Principal office, secretary, and teachers’ room	2
	At least two administrative facilities	1
	At least one or no administrative facility	0
(7) Complementary facilities	Warehouse and pantry	2
	Only one complementary facility	1
	No complementary facility	0
(8) Recreation areas	Covered and open-air schoolyard, green area, and multiuse room	2
	At least two recreation areas	1
	One recreation area and/or yard	0
(9) Library and Reading room	Library	2
	Reading room or reading corner in the classrooms	1
	No reading space	0
(10) Playground and equipment	Playground and toys	2
	Or playground or toys	1
	No playground and no toys	0
(11) TVs and DVDs	Has television and DVDs devices	2
	Has only television	1
	Has no television and DVD	0
(12) Copier and printer	Has a copier and a printer	2
	Has one of the two pieces of equipment	1
	Has neither of the pieces of equipment	0
(13) Sound system and multimedia	Has a sound system and multimedia	2
	Has at least one piece of equipment	1
	Has neither a sound system nor a multimedia equipment	0

	N	%
Bellow adequate	12	8.3
Basic	60	41.4
Adequate	73	50.3
Total	145	100.0

	N	%
Bellow adequate	7	4.8
Basic	39	26.9
Adequate	99	68.3
Total	145	100.0

	N	%
Bellow adequate	5	3.4
Basic	66	45.5
Adequate	74	51.0
Total	145	100.0

	N	%
Bellow adequate	134	92.4
Basic	11	7.6
Total	145	100.0

	N	%
Bellow adequate	79	54.5
Basic	11	7.6
Adequate	64	44.1
Total	145	100.0

	N	%
Basic	55	37.9
Adequate	90	62.1
Total	145	100.0

	N	%
Bellow adequate	73	50.3
Basic	34	23.4
Adequate	38	26.6
Total	145	100.0

	Low-income	Middle class	High class	Total
Less adequate	29.7%	53.2%	17.1%	100,0
Average adequacy	21.1%	63.2%	15.8%	100,0
More adequate	13.3%	66.7%	20.0%	100,0

Checked item	Presence in the EMEIs (%)
Checked item	Censo Escolar 2019	In locovisit
Covered schoolyard	35.9%	66.5%
Open-air schoolyard	0%	99.1%
Adapted restroom	84.6%	99.6%
Playground	64.1%	98.7%
Green area	36.8%	94.0%
Toys	91.5%	93.1

[1] E-mail: daniels.braga@hotmail.com

Brasil

Brasil

What Explains the Infrastructure Inequality of the EMEIs in Belo Horizonte?

ABSTRACT