Sistematización de la atención de enfermería perioperatoria en la cirugía robotizada: validación de instrumento

Vitoriano, Laís Vilanova Tavares; Bridi, Adriana Carla; Silva Junior, Osnir Claudiano da; Silva, Carlos Roberto Lyra da; Louro, Thiago Quinellato; Machado, Daniel Aragão

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

ORIGINAL ARTICLE • Rev. Bras. Enferm. 76 (Suppl 4) • 2023 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0666 copiar

Sistematización de la atención de enfermería perioperatoria en la cirugía robotizada: validación de instrumento

Autoría SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

RESUMEN

Objetivo:

Desarrollar y validar un instrumento para auxiliar en la sistematización de la atención de enfermería perioperatoria en cirugía robotizada.

Métodos:

Estudio metodológico desarrollado en cuatro fases: análisis del contenido; elaboración textual; validación del contenido por el equipo de jueces especialistas y público objetivo; y elaboración del diseño del instrumento electrónico.

Resultados:

Participaron 11 jueces especialistas y 7 evaluadores del público objetivo. Para validación, se utilizó el Índice de Validez de Contenido (IVC) con punto de corte en 0,78. El IVC total del instrumento después de la evaluación fue de 0,90 por los jueces especialistas y 0,88 por el público objetivo.

Conclusión:

La herramienta construida se mostró satisfactoria para realización de la sistematización de la atención de enfermería perioperatoria. La construcción del instrumento fue basada en la literatura científica actualizada y validada por los jueces especialistas y público objetivo.

Descriptores:
Enfermagem Perioperatória; Cuidados de Enfermagem; Assistência Perioperatória; Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos; Estudo de Validação

Variables	Expert judges
Variables	f	%
Gender
Female	11	100
Age group (years)
31–40	7	63.6
41–50	1	9.1
51-60	2	18.2
61 or more	1	9.1
Degree
Specialization	6	54.5
Master's Degree	2	18.2
Doctorate	3	27.3
Length of professional experience (years)
0-5	1	9.1
5-10	1	9.1
10-20	5	45.4
20-30	1	9.1
More than 30	3	27.3
Are you specialized in surgical center and/or robotic surgery?
Yes	9	81.8
No	2	18.2
Work area
Care	3	27.3
Managerial	4	36.4
Teaching and/or research	3	27.3
Sales	1	9.0
Institution where you work
Public	7	63.6
Private	4	36.4
Previous experience with instrument construction and/or validation?
Yes	9	81.8
No	2	18.2

Variables	Target audience
Variables	n	%
Gender
Female	7	100
Age group (years)
31–40	4	57.2
41 – 50	3	42.8
Degree
Specialization	6	85.7
Master's Degree	1	14.3
Length of professional experience (years)
5-10	4	57.2
10-20	2	28.5
20-30	1	14.3
Are you specialized in surgical center and/or robotic surgery?
Yes	5	71.5
No	2	28.5
Work area
Care	6	85.7
Managerial	1	14.3
Institution where you work
Public	7	100
Private	-
Previous experience with instrument validation?
Yes	1	14.3
No	6	85.7

Evaluated items	CVI
Evaluated items	Expert judges	Target audience
1.1 Block 1: Objectives	0.89	0.91
1.1 The text is compatible with the target audience, including SPNC.	0.9	0.85
1.2 The content covered is adequate for performing SPNC in the perioperative period of robotic surgery.	0.9	0.85
1.3 Guidelines presented are necessary and have been addressed correctly.	0.9	1
1.4 It causes change in behavior and attitudes.	0.9	1
1.5 Information is updated.	0.81	1
1.6 The content meets the work proposal.	0.9	0.72
1.7 It can be applied in practice.	0.9	1
2.2 Block 2: Structure and Presentation	0.87	0.83
2.1 Application-type technology is appropriate to assist in SPNC in the perioperative period of robotic surgery.	1	0.83
2.2 The language is appropriate for the target audience.	0.9	1
2.3 The information is presented clearly and objectively.	0.9	1
2.4 The instrument has adequate size, that is, it is not tiring.	0.6	0.42
2.5 The formatting is adequate (letter, size, space).	0.9	0.85
2.6 The size and color of the letters of the headings, subheadings and text are adequate.	0.9	0.66
2.7 The writing style corresponds to the level of knowledge of the target audience.	0.9	1
2.8 There is a logical sequence of proposed content.	0.9	0.85
3.3 Block 3: Relevance	1	0.95
3.1 The material includes the matters necessary to carry out the SPNC.	1	0.85
3.2 Is the instrument adequate for use by any nurse with experience in the operating theatre and/or robotic surgery?	1	1
3.3 Does the instrument contemplate and integrate the main points of patient care in the perioperative period?	1	1
Total CVI of the instrument	0.9	0.88

Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem SGA Norte Quadra 603 Conj. "B" - Av. L2 Norte 70830-102 Brasília, DF, Brasil, Tel.: (55 61) 3226-0653, Fax: (55 61) 3225-4473 - Brasília - DF - Brazil
E-mail: reben@abennacional.org.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Corresponding author: Laís Vilanova Tavares Vitoriano E-mail: laisvilanovaa@gmail.com