Abstract

This paper to examine the thesis about the interpreters of the Constitution, the pluralization of the debate and the constitutional process. The starting point for such a study is due to the recent positions taken by the Supreme Court (STF) based on democratic participation in their decisions. The study presents each of the major themes of the interpreters of the Constitution, in order not to fossilize the law and/or not allowing that it be far away from the whole society. By logical consequence, it is mandatory to near law and society. This happens due to the occurence of such activity at the level of problematic interpretation issue, which permeates the concerning results.

Keywords:
Judicial Review Legitimacy; Social Dialogue Into the STF; Public Deliberation and the Amicus Curiae Into the Objective Judicial Review