Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Coordination polymers and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) represent one of the most attractive research areas of coordination chemistry. The combination of metal ions and organic linkers provides various possibilities for the fabrication of materials with different structure and functionality. These have wide potential applications in the fields of gas adsorption and storage, separation, sensors and catalysis.¹1 Maji, T. K.; Matsuda, R.; Kitagawa, S.; Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 142.

2 Murray, L. J.; Dinca, M.; Long, J. R.; Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1294.

3 Wang, P.; Okamura, T. A.; Zhou, H. P.; Sun, W. Y.; Tian, Y. P.; Chin. Chem. Lett. 2013, 24, 20.

4 Chen, S.S.; Chen, M.; Takamizawa, S.; Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4902.

5 Seyedi, S. M.; Sandaroos, R.; Zohuri, G. H.; Chin. Chem. Lett. 2010, 21, 1303.^-66 Zhao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Okamura, T.; Chen, M.; Lu, Y.; Sun, W.-Y.; Yu, J.-Q.; Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 5889. These crystalline, highly porous solids can possess ultra-high Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface areas (~7000 m² g^-1.⁷7 Furukawa, H.; Ko, N.; Go, Y. B.; Aratani, N.; Choi, S. B.; Choi, E.; Yazaydin, A. O.; Snurr, R. Q.; O'Keeffe, M.; Kim, J.; Yaghi, O. M.; Science 2010, 329, 424.

8 Yuan, D.; Zhao, D.; Sun, D.; Zhou, H. C.; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5357.

9 Farha, O. K.; Eryazici, I.; Jeong, N. C.; Hauser, B. G.; Wilmer, C. E.; Sarjeant, A. A.; Snurr, R. Q.; Nguyen, S. T.; Yazaydin, A. Ö.; Hupp, J. T.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15016.^-1010 Farha, O. K.; Yazaydın, A. Ö.; Eryazici, I.; Malliakas, C. D.; Hauser, B. G.; Kanatzidis, M. G.; Nguyen, S. T.; Snurr, R. Q.; Hupp, J. T.; Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 944. Due to their modular nature and structural tunability, application of MOFs has been widening in the fields of light harvesting,¹¹11 So, M. C.; Jin, S.; Son, H. J.; Wiederrecht, G. P.; Farha, O. K.; Hupp, J. T.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 15698.

12 Son, H. J.; Jin, S.; Patwardhan, S.; Wezenberg, S. J.; Jeong, N. C.; So, M.; Wilmer, C. E.; Sarjeant, A. A.; Schatz, G. C.; Snurr, R. Q.; Farha, O. K.; Wiederrecht, G. P.; Hupp, J. T.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 862.

13 Jin, S. Y.; Son, H. J.; Farha, O. K.; Wiederrecht, G. P.; Hupp, J. T.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 955.

14 Kent, C. A.; Mehl, B. P.; Ma, L.; Papanikolas, J. M.; Meyer, T. J.; Lin, W.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12767.^-1515 Kent, C. A.; Liu, D.; Ma, L.; Papanikolas, J. M.; Meyer, T. J.; Lin, W.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12940. sensing,¹⁶16 Kreno, L. E.; Leong, K.; Farha, O. K.; Allendorf, M.; Van Richard P., D.; Hupp, J. T.; Chem. Rev. (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2012, 112, 1105. optical luminescence,¹⁷17 Sun, C.-Y.; Wang, X.-L.; Zhang, X.; Qin, C.; Li, P.; Su, Z.-M.; Zhu, D.-X.; Shan, G.-G.; Shao, K.-Z.; Wu, H.; Li, J.; Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2717.^,1818 Cui, Y.; Yue, Y.; Qian, G.; Chen, B.; Chem. Rev. (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2012, 112, 1126. ionic conductivity,¹⁹19 Aubrey, M. L.; Ameloot, R.; Wiers, B. M.; Long, J. R.; Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 667.

20 Shigematsu, A.; Yamada, T.; Kitagawa, H.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 2034.^-2121 Horike, S.; Umeyama, D.; Kitagawa, S.; Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2376. nonlinear optical behavior²²22 Lin, W.; Wu, S. In Metal-Organic Frameworks; MacGillivray, L. R., ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, 2010; pp 193-213. and as precursors for the synthesis of nanomaterials with interesting properties.²³23 Pang, H.; Gao, F.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Q.; Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 5862.

24 Wang, D.; Ni, W.; Pang, H.; Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 6830.

25 Shi, H.-Y.; Deng, B.; Zhong, S.-L.; Wang, L.; Xu, A.-W.; J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 12309.

26 Jin, L. N.; Liu, Q.;Sun, W. Y.; CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 7721.

27 Cho, W.; Park, S.; Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4138.

28 Jung, S.; Cho, W.; Lee, H. J.; Oh, M.; Angew. Chem. , Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1459.^-2929 Masoomi, M. Y.; Morselli. A.; Chem. Rev. 2012, 256, 2921.

A huge variety of MOFs have been synthesized and reported so far with synthesis techniques such as hydrothermal, solvothermal, microwave assisted heating, mechanochemical, electrochemical and, more recently, ultrasonic processes.³⁰30 Lee, Y. R.; Kim, J.; Ahn, W. S.; Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2013, 30, 1667. Ni-BTC, as a part of this long chain of MOFs, has been initially reported by Yaghi.³¹31 Yaghi, O. M.; Li, H.; Groy, T. L.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9096. DUT-9³²32 Gedrich, K.; Senkovska, I.; Klein, N.; Stoeck, U.; Henschel, A.; Lohe, M. R.; Baburin, I. A.; Mueller, U.; Kaskel, S.; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8489. constructed by btb linkers (btb = benzene 1,3,5-tribenzoate) and {Ni₅(µ₃-O)₂(O₂C)₆}, porous paddle-wheel structures using different combination of metal/organic linker/base/solvents via high throughput synthesis³³33 Maniam, P.; Stock, N.; Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 5085. and CPO-27(Ni)³⁴34 Haque, E.; Jhung, S. H.; Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 866. are few other noticeable contributions to Ni based porous solids.

Because each different lab has been reporting different solvent conditions, solvent effect was tested in this study with different solvent mixtures of water/N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), water/ethanol, and water/ethanol/DMF with or without a variety of bases at 160 ºC for 48 hours. Because bases added to the solution may help deprotonate from BTC for the formation of Ni-BTC, the effect of a variety of bases of NaOH, NH₄OH, pyridine (Pyr), aniline (Anl), and trimethylamine (TMA) was also tested in this research work. In the present work, we have opted for solvothermal synthesis of Ni-BTC. Isolated MOF crystals were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement, scanning electron microscope (SEM), FTIR, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) techniques together with the BET surface area measurement.

EXPERIMENTAL

All materials including NiNO₃.6H₂O (99.5%, Alfa Aesar), 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (H₃BTC)(99%, Alfa Aesar), DMF (99.8%, Alfa Aesar), ethanol (94-96%, Alfa Aesar), NaOH (pellets 98%, Alfa Aesar), NH₃ water (1 mol L^-1 NH₃ in H₂O, Daejung chem.), aniline (99.5%, Daejung chem.), trimethylamine (99%, Alfa Aesar), and pyridine (99.5%, Daejung chem.) were used as received. We have synthesized seven Ni-BTC yields from combination of these solvents.

Preparation of Ni-BTC solution

Two solutions of 20 mmol of NiNO₃.6H₂O dissolved in 40 mL deionized water and 10 mmol of H₃BTC dissolved in 40 mL organic solvent were prepared separately. The two solutions were then mixed and loaded in a Teflon liner assembly. Prepared organic solvent was each pure DMF, pure ethanol, a mixture of DMF (24 mL) and 0.2 mol L^-1 NH₄OH in water (16 mL), a mixture of DMF (25 mL) and 0.2 mol L^-1 TMA, a mixture of DMF (26 mL) and 0.2 mol L^-1 pyridine in water (14 mL), a mixture of DMF (26 mL) and 0.2 mol L^-1 aniline in water (14 mL), and a mixture of DMF (27 mL) and 0.2 mol L^-1 NaOH in water (13 mL). Measured pH ranges of the prepared solution mixtures were 2 - 2.15.

The Teflon liner assembly consisted of a Teflon crucible with a cover. This Teflon liner was then placed inside a stainless steel enclosure which was completely tightened before placing it inside the convection oven. Such assembly completely blocked the vaporization of any solvent from the reaction system. The assembly is shown in Figure 1.

Each of these solution mixtures was heated at 160 ºC for 48 hours in a convection oven. The Teflon liner assembly was then cooled to room temperature. MOF crystals were filtered and washed with deionized water (20 mL × 3) and ethanol (20 mL × 3) successively. The obtained MOF crystals were dried for 12 hours at 100 ºC prior to the analytical works.

Characterization

The XRD measurement was performed by using Rikagu D/MAX 2200H (Bede model 200) using a Cu-K_α radiation source of wavelength λ = 1.5406 Å, and the diffraction intensity were recorded in 2θ range of 2-60º with a step of 0.0092º The XRD patterns were analyzed with Xpert HighScore Plus software. The diffraction peaks were identified through search match option with inbuilt ICSD repository of HighScore Plus software. The Rietveld analysis was used to obtain approximated chemical formulas of product phases in each synthesized MOF. The FTIR spectra were collected on a Bruker IFS66/S Fourier transform IR spectrophotometer for the MOF-KBr disks at room temperature. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations were performed on JEOL, JEM1200EX II set up equipped with field emission gun. BET surface areas of the samples were determined from N₂ adsorption isotherms at liquid nitrogen temperature (-196 ºC) using a Micrometrics ASAP 2420. Surface composition of MOFs was measured with theta probe AR-XPS system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK). XPS measurements were made with mono chromatic Al-K_α X-ray source. Thermogravimetric analyses were recorded through SDT2960 (DTA-TGA).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Ni-BTC MOF was obtained by solvothermal reaction of NiNO₃.6H₂O and H₃BTC in 2:1 molar ratio as described before. Light green MOFs were obtained from the reactions. The isolated yields of MOFs were variable between 34~75% depending on the applied solvent conditions. The physical properties of isolated Ni-BTC MOFs are listed in Table 1. The highest yield of 75% was obtained from Ni-BTC_NaOH. Solutions with the addition of base improved the isolated yields ranging 73~75%, except for the case of aniline, Ni-BTC_Anl, addition (34%). Conditions without base resulted in either similar yield of 72% for Ni-BTC_EtOH or relatively low yield of 57% for Ni-BTC_DMF. A comparison with some selected previously reported synthesis routes has been presented in Table 2. It represented a summary of results from various previously synthesized Nickel based MOFs. It gave a good account of variety of synthesis techniques, organic linkers and operational conditions for the preparation of the final product.

The XRD patterns are shown in Figure 2. Interestingly, all of the XRD patterns show different diffraction patterns meaning they are formed with different crystal structures. The XRD patterns from the products in this synthesis are quite different from those reported in various studies,³¹31 Yaghi, O. M.; Li, H.; Groy, T. L.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9096.

32 Gedrich, K.; Senkovska, I.; Klein, N.; Stoeck, U.; Henschel, A.; Lohe, M. R.; Baburin, I. A.; Mueller, U.; Kaskel, S.; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8489.

33 Maniam, P.; Stock, N.; Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 5085.^-3434 Haque, E.; Jhung, S. H.; Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 866. since each and every process has been accomplished with variety of solvents, reaction conditions, metal precursors and reaction modes. Thus every aspect of chemical reaction, whether it is the nature of solvent and precursor, base solution, reaction temperature, synthesis route and reactant concentration, has a strong bearing on the final structure of the product. This fact appeared quite evidently during this synthesis. Here every Ni-BTC resulting from various combinations of solvents and bases showed a unique XRD pattern, which is a testimony of the fact that each Ni-BTC has nucleated with its own crystal structure as shown in Table 1 and from their chemical composition.

In comparison, the XRDs of Ni-BTCs resulting from the combinations of water/DMF-NaOH, water/DMF-NH₄OH, water/DMF-pyr and water/DMF-TMA showed good crystallinity. The peaks appearing in these patterns are more pronounced and sharp. It seemed that a majority of bases in the present work have helped in deprotonation of carboxylic acid and the resultant Ni-BTCs are more refined. Whereas the addition of aniline seemed to have negative effect which not only reduced the % yield, but also resulted in a product which have distorted structure.

The patterns were analyzed with HighScore Plus. For each XRD pattern, a diffraction line (with *) at 2θ value of 2.80º denotes the Ni₂O₃ (002) impurity presence. The detailed analysis of XRD patterns and Rietveld analysis revealed the results as under:

Ni-BTC_ANL: (C₁₇ H₁₉ N₂ Ni₅ O₁₀); calc: C = 28.9%, H = 2.69%, N = 3.97%, Ni = 41.66%, O = 22.71%.

Ni-BTC_DMF: (C₃₉ H₄₄ N₄ Ni₁₄ O₂₁); calc: C = 27.12%, H = 2.54%, N = 3.24%, Ni = 47.6%, O = 19.46%.

Ni-BTC_EtOH: (C₁₂ H₂₃ N₄ Ni O₄); calc: C = 41.65%, H = 6.65%, N = 16.2%, Ni = 16.98%, O = 18.51%.

Ni-BTC_NaOH: (C_4.5 H_17.64 N_8.7 Ni_2.3 O_3.8); calc: C = 14%, H = 4.54%, N = 31.25%, Ni = 34.5%, O = 15.7%.

Ni-BTC_NH4OH: (C₇ H₂₅ N₁₁ Ni₃ O₄); calc: C = 17.4%, H = 5.07%, N = 32.68%, Ni = 33.2%, O = 11.65%.

Ni-BTC_Pyr: (C₄₀ H₄₆ N₅ Ni₁₅ O₂₂); calc: C = 26.5%, H = 2.53%, N = 3.55%, Ni = 48.44%, O = 17.34%.

Ni-BTC_TMA: (C₁₈ H₃₃ N₉ Ni₄ O₈); calc: C = 29.27%, H = 4.47%, N = 17.07%, Ni = 31.82%, O = 17.34%.

The crystal structure parameters of these MOFs are shown in Table 1. The FTIR spectra of all of the synthesized MOFs are shown in Figure 3. They show similar IR absorption patterns with Ni ion coordinated COO moiety in the range of 1350-1650 cm^-1,³⁵35 Kumagai, H.; Oka, Y.; Akita-Tanaka, M.; Inoue, K.; Inorg. Chim. Acta 2002, 332, 176. and ν _C-N and ν _CN-CHO vibrational frequencies observed at 1103 and 936 cm^-1 indicated the presence of Ni coordinating to DMF molecules. The C=O band at 1600 cm^-1 in FTIR spectra of Ni-BTCs represented the amide group from DMF. In general, the amide group from DMF appears at 1630-1695 cm^-1 in IR spectra. From the Figure 3 it is evident that Ni-BTC_TMA, Ni-BTC_NH4OH and Ni-BTC_NaOH showed more intense Ni-DMF coordination band as compared to the rest of the four Ni-BTCs.

The BET adsorption isothermal experiment was performed with N₂ at liquid nitrogen temperature (-197 ºC), and the resulted plots are shown in Figure 4. The BET surface area data are summarized in Table 3. The largest BET surface area was obtained from Ni-BTC_NH4OH with 850 m²/g. The other MOFs also showed good potential in terms of their physiosorption, and properties such as pore size, pore volume and average particle size, except for MOFs of Ni-BTC_Anl and Ni-BTC_NaOH, which are basically meso-porous with extremely low BET surface areas of 8.96 and 1.8692 m² g^-1, respectively. Pore volumes are reasonably ranged between 0.36-0.51 cm³ g^-1 from good Ni-BTCs MOFs.

The calculated pore diameters of Ni-BTC_DMF, Ni-BTC_NH4OH, Ni-BTC_TMA, Ni-BTC_EtOH and Ni-BTC_pyr are in 20-25 Å range, which is higher than the average molecular diameter of N₂ (16.2 Å). Thus, these Ni-BTCs present enough surface area and pore window opening to nitrogen gas for adsorption. The addition of bases NH₄OH, TMA and pyridine to the solvent mixture of water/DMF tends to produce a Ni-MOF yield with appreciable surface area. Possibly the base addition is helping in the removal of solvent molecules from the pores of synthesized MOF. Surprisingly, NaOH is the stronger base than the rest and its deprotonation effects are evident from the 75% yield of Ni-BTC_NaOH. But NaOH did not prove to be effective in obtaining high surface area Ni-MOF, probably due to the pore window size being too much restricted in this case that it did not allow the nitrogen gas molecules to access the pores. Similarly, the addition of aniline is also working negatively. Aniline is a weak base and does not seem to facilitate the formation of MOF either.

The top 5 nm surface compositions of MOFs were measured by XPS analysis and the plots are shown in Figure 5. The XPS results demonstrate the appearance of C1s, Ni2p₃ and O1s peaks, which is the testimony for the presence of fundamental elements of BTC coordinated to Ni in this metal organic framework. The surface morphology through scanning electron microscope (SEM) images in Figure 6 (a) of the MOF powders suggested that Ni-BTC_Anl has granular structure (a), whereas the other Ni-BTCs (b-g) have predominantly rod shaped particle morphology for each MOF.

Thermogravimetric analyses were performed under N₂ atmosphere and the results are shown in Figure 7. Each of the thermogram of Ni-BTCs has three distinct regions at different temperature ranges. Initial weight losses until decomposition were attributed to the loss of moisture and solvent molecules trapped in the cavities.³²32 Gedrich, K.; Senkovska, I.; Klein, N.; Stoeck, U.; Henschel, A.; Lohe, M. R.; Baburin, I. A.; Mueller, U.; Kaskel, S.; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8489. The MOF structures of Ni-BTC_EtOH, Ni-BTC_NaOH, Ni-BTC_NH4OH, Ni-BTC_pyr and Ni-BTC_Anl showed almost similar TGA curves. The respective initial weight losses of 30, 27, 27, 25 and 20% in the same sequence are due to the loss of moisture and solvent molecules until 400 ºC. As the heating continued, the MOF structures became unstable and collapsed. The Ni-BTC_DMF showed good thermal stability with a weight loss of 6% up to 300 ºC. This weight loss may be due to the moisture content in the MOF. From 300-325 ºC, the weight loss increased up to 45%. The increased weight loss may be attributed to the separation of DMF molecules from the structure. Between 325-400 ºC MOF network decomposed and finally a residue of 38% was left after the completion of process. In TGA curve of Ni-BTC_TMA, the structure was quite stable until 300 ºC as the initial loss in weight was just 8%, however, as the heating continued there appeared a rapid and spontaneous decrease of weight due to simultaneous separation of water molecules and DMF solvent. In the process MOF structure collapsed around 350 ºC.

In comparison, five Ni-BTCs (Ni-BTC_EtOH, Ni-BTC_NaOH, Ni-BTC_NH4OH, Ni-BTC_pyr and Ni-BTC_Anl) showed good thermal stability and these structures were proved to be more robust than the other two. In a way, it can be safely predicted that incorporation of bases tends to produce MOF structures which have comparatively higher chemical and thermal stability.

CONCLUSION

Solvothermal synthesis of Ni-BTC MOF was performed with a variety of solvent conditions with or without addition of bases at 160 ºC for 48 hours. Physical properties of MOFs obtained from each reaction condition were tested. BET surface areas are ranged between 590-850 m³ g^-1 and pore volumes between 0.36-0.51 cm³ g^-1 which show reasonably acceptable potential in terms of their gas physiosorption property, except for the Ni-BTC_Anl and Ni-BTC_NaOH which show extremely small cavities within MOFs.

Solutions with the addition of base improved the isolated yields ranging 72~75% except for the case of aniline, Ni-BTC_Anl, addition (34%), whereas pure DMF condition (Ni-BTC_DMF) resulted in 57% of isolated yield. Addition of NH₄OH for the preparation of reaction sample lead to the optimum MOF with the highest BET surface area of 850 m² g^-1, pore volume of 0.51 cm³ g^-1 and good isolated yield of 74%.

All XRD patterns show all different diffraction patterns from different crystal structures, and the crystal of Ni-BTC_Anl with the lowest surface area does not show clear diffraction patterns.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), grant funded through the ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (No. 2014R1A2A1A01006421)

REFERENCES

Publication Dates

History